chore: Update CODEOWNERS #1949
chore: Update CODEOWNERS #1949
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @flashinfer-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request automates the maintenance of the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughThe Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
Comment |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This automated PR updates the .github/CODEOWNERS file. The change correctly reorders owners for the scripts/ path based on the analysis script. While reviewing the context, I noticed that the generation script has a flaw that can lead to duplicate owners, as seen on line 41 of the file. I have added a comment with details on the issue and a recommendation for fixing the script to improve future updates. The change in this PR itself is acceptable.
| include/flashinfer/trtllm/ @joker-eph @aleozlx @yzh119 @cyx-6 @aleozlx | ||
| profiler/ @cyx-6 | ||
| scripts/ @yzh119 @nvmbreughe @yongwww @bkryu @dierksen | ||
| scripts/ @yzh119 @nvmbreughe @dierksen @yongwww @bkryu |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While this line has been updated correctly by the automation, the script that generates the CODEOWNERS file (scripts/codeowner_analyzer.py) appears to have a bug that can lead to duplicate entries. For instance, line 41 in this file lists @aleozlx twice.
This likely occurs because the generation script does not deduplicate the list of owners, which can happen if a single person contributes with multiple emails that resolve to the same GitHub username.
To prevent this in the future, the script should be updated to ensure the list of owners for any given path is unique. Using a set to collect the usernames before joining them into a string would be an effective solution.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Deploy Docs
| include/flashinfer/trtllm/ @joker-eph @aleozlx @yzh119 @cyx-6 @aleozlx | ||
| profiler/ @cyx-6 | ||
| scripts/ @yzh119 @nvmbreughe @yongwww @bkryu @dierksen | ||
| scripts/ @yzh119 @nvmbreughe @dierksen @yongwww @bkryu |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
CODEOWNERS update for scripts/ path looks good.
The reordering of owners on line 43 reflects the commit activity analysis (frequency, coverage, and recency) from the 180-day git history window, which is the expected behavior from the automated workflow. All five owners remain assigned; only their sequence has changed based on contribution metrics.
If you'd like, you can verify that the new owner order aligns with actual commit contributions by inspecting the git history:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify commit frequency for each owner in the scripts/ directory over the last 180 days
DAYS=180
DATE_SINCE=$(date -d "$DAYS days ago" +%Y-%m-%d)
echo "Commit frequency by author in scripts/ over the last $DAYS days (since $DATE_SINCE):"
git log --since="$DATE_SINCE" --pretty=format:"%an" -- scripts/ | sort | uniq -c | sort -rnLength of output: 301
CODEOWNERS ordering for scripts/ does not match commit frequency—@yongwww and @dierksen are swapped.
The git log shows @yongwww with 5 commits and @dierksen with 2 commits over the past 180 days. The current line has @dierksen (position 3) ranked higher than @yongwww (position 4), which contradicts the stated contribution metrics.
Expected order: scripts/ @yzh119 @nvmbreughe @yongwww @dierksen @bkryu
Actual order: scripts/ @yzh119 @nvmbreughe @dierksen @yongwww @bkryu
Swap positions 3 and 4 to align with commit frequency.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/CODEOWNERS around line 43: the owners list for scripts/ is ordered
incorrectly per commit frequency; swap the two handles so the line reads with
@yongwww before @dierksen. Edit the file to replace "scripts/ @yzh119
@nvmbreughe @dierksen @yongwww @bkryu" with "scripts/ @yzh119 @nvmbreughe
@yongwww @dierksen @bkryu" and commit the change.
Auto-generated CODEOWNERS update based on commit activity over the last 180 days. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
flashinfer-bot
force-pushed
the
auto-update-codeowners
branch
from
4446fc8 to
18b5b3e
Compare
2 participants
Summary
This PR updates the CODEOWNERS file based on git commit history analysis from the last 180 days.
Changes
.github/CODEOWNERSwith current code ownership based on:How to Review
.github/CODEOWNERSNotes
🤖 This PR was automatically generated by the update-codeowners workflow
Summary by CodeRabbit
Note: This update contains no user-facing changes or feature updates. It is an internal administrative modification.